As a copy editor with experience in SEO, it`s important to understand the difference between a treaty and an executive agreement. The primary difference between these two types of international agreements lies in their legal status and the process by which they are enacted.
A treaty is a legally binding agreement between two or more countries. It is negotiated by diplomats, signed by government officials, and ratified by the respective governments. Treaties require approval by a two-thirds vote in the US Senate. Once ratified, treaties become a part of US law and are enforceable in US courts.
On the other hand, an executive agreement is a less formal agreement between two or more countries. It does not require Senate approval and is usually made by the President. Executive agreements are often used for matters of diplomacy, such as trade agreements or military alliances. They may also be used for more mundane matters, such as postal treaties or extradition agreements.
While executive agreements do not require Senate approval, they are still considered to have legal force and can be enforced in US courts. However, their legal status is not as strong as that of a treaty.
In summary, the main difference between a treaty and an executive agreement is the level of formality involved in the negotiation and approval process. Treaties are more formal and require Senate approval, while executive agreements are less formal and do not require Senate approval. Both types of agreements are legally binding, but treaties have a stronger legal status. As a copy editor, it`s important to understand these differences and accurately convey them in your writing.